| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Bailiff v. Tipping ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Bailiff v. Tipping
''Bailiff v. Tipping'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a citation must accompany a writ of error in order for the court to hear the case.
== Background ==
In the older common law procedure, a ''writ of error'' was a writ issued by an appellate court directing a lower court to deliver the record in the case for review. It was the most common form of remedial process available to the losing party after the final determination of the case on its merits.〔''Black's Law Dictionary'' (8th ed., 2004).〕 Similarly in the older common law context, a ''citation'' was a court-issued writ commanding a person to appear at a certain time and place in order to do something demanded in the writ, or to show cause for not doing something demanded.〔
At which was whether the courts of the United States have jurisdiction to hear a case in which one alien sues another alien.
The Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky held that the courts did not have jurisdiction in a case where the parties were both aliens. There was a writ of error to the Supreme Court.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Bailiff v. Tipping」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|